In the eastern regions of Ukraine, the ground forces, led by Colonel-General Oleksandr Syrskyi, are maintaining a state of robust defense. This strategy, termed “active defense,” is aimed at keeping Russian forces continually engaged and off-balance. Syrskyi, a seasoned commander with experience dating back to the beginning of the conflict in 2014, has earned a reputation for his tactical acumen, likening his approach to the hunting strategy of a snow leopard – careful, cunning, and courageous.
The Ukrainian forces are not just holding their ground but are also looking for opportunities to launch strategic counterattacks. This approach is necessitated by several factors, including a need to conserve ammunition and manage troop strength. The engagements have become more calculated, with large-scale offensives becoming increasingly rare. The shift towards the use of drones and other technological advancements has also influenced this change in tactics.
Despite initial optimism for a significant Ukrainian counteroffensive, Russian defenses have largely held firm, leading to a more static and attritional phase of the conflict. This reality has tempered expectations for rapid Ukrainian advances. Russia, on its part, continues to exert pressure along the eastern front, seeking control of key regions like Donbas and attempting to reclaim territories in Kherson and Zaporizhzhia.
The battles, especially in places like Bakhmut, have been costly, raising questions among some military analysts about the strategic value of such engagements. Nonetheless, Ukrainian forces have continued to inflict considerable losses on Russian troops and their allied forces, including the Wagner mercenary group.
As the conflict nears its second anniversary, both sides are increasingly relying on technology and electronic warfare. Ukraine, acknowledging a shortfall in ammunition, has been urging its Western partners for more support, particularly in advanced military equipment.
In summary, the Ukrainian ground forces continue to demonstrate resilience and adaptability under challenging circumstances. Their approach of “active defense” highlights a strategic patience, waiting for the right moments to strike, even as they maintain a strong defensive posture. The conflict continues to evolve, marked by smaller but significant engagements, technological advancements, and a relentless quest for tactical advantages.